Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Energy Transfer vs Enterprise Partners: which is the better MLP stock?

MLPs are some of the most important companies in the mid-stream energy sector because of the transportation and storage services they offer. Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) and Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) are some of the biggest firms in the industry. Other prominent MLPs are TC Energy, Kinder Morgan, and Magellan Midstream Partners.

Enterprise Products Partners vs Energy Transfer

Enterprise Products Partners vs Energy Transfer

EPD and ET are two of the biggest players in the midstream industry. They are also highly popular among analysts, with most of them having buy ratings on the shares. MLPs are loved because they tend to do well in all periods.

According to Yahoo Finance, the average analysts target of Energy Transfer is $16.75, which is higher than the current $12.76. Similarly, the average target for Enterprise Products stock is $31.67, higher than the present $26.33. So, which of the two is a better investment?

Looking at their stock performance, Energy Transfer has been a better investment over the years. Its stock has returned ~85% in the past 10 years compared to Enterprise’s 64.64%. The same is true in 2023, where ET has jumped by 10% vs EPD’s 9.16%.

Most investors invest in MLPs because of their dividends. ET has a forward dividend yield of 9.56% compared to Enterprise’s 7.44%. In addition to a high dividend yield, Energy Transfer has a lower payout ratio of 71.5% compared to EPD’s 75.6%. The payout ratio is an important because it shows the percentage of net income that it pays in dividends. Energy Transfer wins in this regard.

Analysts believe that Enterprise’s dividends will rise when it completes ongoing projects, which aree valued at over $6 billion. Most of these projects will complete in the next few years and boost its EBITDA.

EPD vs ET valuation and growth

Valuation is an important metric to consider because you want to invest in a company that is not overvalued. Enterprise Product Partners has a trailing and forward PE ratio of 10.55 and 10.16, respectively. On the other hand, Energy Transfer’s multiples are 9.13 and 8.18, respectively. While the margin is a bit tight, ET wins in this regard.

Financials are where Enterprise wins against ET. The most recent results showed that Enterprise’s revenue grew by 42.5% in the fourth quarter while Energy Transfer’s grew by 33%. EPD has a forward EBITDA growth of 4.50% vs ET’s -2.7%. 

These metrics explain why Energy Transfers recently decided to implement a large acquisition. The company is buying Lotus Midstream in a $1.45 billion deal. Lotus operates the Centurion Pipeline system, which are located in the most active areas of the Permian Basin.

Therefore, based on all these metrics, I believe that Energy Transfer is a better investment than Enterprise Products Partners. It is reasonably priced, has a strong balance sheet, and long track record of performance.

The post Energy Transfer vs Enterprise Partners: which is the better MLP stock? appeared first on Invezz.

    You May Also Like


    On the surface, index and stock options are very similar. Still, there are some differences that traders should be aware of. Understanding these differences...

    Latest News

    The FBI was not forthcoming with the Trump, Biden and Pence classified documents during a House Intelligence Committee briefing last week, and lawmakers still...

    Editor's Pick

    iBASIS and Sequans have been selected by Actility to meet its delivery schedule for eSIM and iSIM iBASIS and Sequans now considered frontrunners in...


    American Airlines is getting rid of its traditional frequent flyer award chart as the carrier moves toward dynamic pricing for mileage redemptions, the latest shift in its lucrative AAdvantage...

    Disclaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024